AI

DeepSeek R1 Open-Source AI Model - China's Shocking AI Innovation

How DeepSeek R1 shocked OpenAI and Anthropic. Achieved GPT-4 level performance at 1/10 the cost - uncovering the secrets of China's open-source AI breakthrough.

Tierize Tech
·5 min read
DeepSeek R1 Open-Source AI Model - China's Shocking AI Innovation

DeepSeek R1 Open Source AI Model - A Shocking AI Innovation from China? (Honest Review)

Honestly, every time AI model news pops up, I'm like, "Seriously?" New models are being released every week, so it's hard to get excited. But DeepSeek R1 is different. It’s hard to just brush it off, because the performance is genuinely impressive. Especially the fact that it's open source is pretty shocking. Considering it was made in China, it feels less like the arrival of a new AI model and more like an event shaking up the entire AI tech space.

At first, I was skeptical. Could an AI model made in China actually surpass GPT-4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet? Was this just hype? But my thinking completely changed when the benchmark results were released.

Numbers don’t lie.

DeepSeek R1 is showing incredible performance, almost like it was developed in a frantic rush. It especially shines when solving math problems or working on coding tasks. It’s said that DeepSeek R1 outperforms OpenAI’s o1 model in many cases. Of course, it can’t be compared to models optimized for complex tasks like long-form coding or computer usage, like Claude Opus 4.6. We all know you have to consider the context when looking at benchmarks, right?

So, let's take a closer look at just how impressive DeepSeek R1 really is.

How well does it perform on different benchmarks?

I’ve seen several benchmark results, and DeepSeek R1 scored around 90.8% on the MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) benchmark. Grok-3 is a bit higher at 92.7%, but honestly, a difference of just a few percentage points isn’t that significant. The important thing is that DeepSeek R1 is approaching the level of GPT-4.

It also shows solid results on coding-related benchmarks like HumanEval. Coding performance can't be explained solely by language understanding ability, so the fact that DeepSeek R1 is performing well there suggests that the model’s structure itself might be specialized for coding, or that the training data likely includes a rich amount of coding-related content.

What about price competitiveness?

This is a really important point. No matter how great the performance is, no one will use it if it’s too expensive. DeepSeek R1 has a huge advantage: it’s open source! That means you can use it for free! With OpenAI or Anthropic’s models, you have to pay per token. DeepSeek R1 offers an amazing value by eliminating that cost.

I tried it out, and using DeepSeek R1 for simple text generation seemed to perform around the level of GPT-3.5 Turbo. It's not as good as GPT-4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet, but considering it's free, it's a really great option.

So, where can you use DeepSeek R1?

DeepSeek R1 can be used in a variety of fields. For example,

  • Chatbot development: You can use it to create chatbots for customer service or information provision. Of course, you'll need to do some additional fine-tuning to create more complex chatbots.
  • Content creation: It can help you generate content like blog posts or marketing materials.
  • Code generation: You can use it to generate simple code or modify existing code.
  • Education: You can build tutoring systems to help students learn.

What are the honest drawbacks?

Of course, DeepSeek R1 isn’t a perfect model. There are definitely some drawbacks.

  • Optimized for English: DeepSeek R1 was primarily trained on English data, so its Korean performance might still be lacking. Of course, you can improve performance by adding Korean data.
  • Hallucinations: Like all LLMs, DeepSeek R1 can sometimes generate incorrect information (hallucinations). Be especially careful when answering complex or ambiguous questions.
  • Output speed: It might be slower than models like Mercury 2 or Granite 3.3 8B. However, this can vary depending on the model's size and structure, so choose a model that’s right for your intended use.

DeepSeek R1, GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet Comparison (Tier Ranking)

Here’s my tier ranking of DeepSeek R1, GPT-4, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. (as of May 2026)

  • GPT-4: S / C (Expensive) / B+ / A
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet: A / C (Expensive) / B / A
  • DeepSeek R1: B+ / A+ (Free) / C+ / B

3 Hidden Insights (Content you won’t find elsewhere)

  1. The Dataset Secret: DeepSeek R1’s incredible performance isn’t just about innovative model structure. The DeepSeek team likely utilized a high-quality dataset that hasn't been publicly revealed. There’s a lot of speculation that it included a significant amount of coding-related data.
  2. China’s AI Talent Pool: China has a huge number of AI professionals. The DeepSeek team was able to leverage this talent to develop an impressive model in a short amount of time.
  3. Government Support: The Chinese government is actively investing in AI technology development. The DeepSeek team was able to focus on research and development thanks to government support. Probably...

Conclusion: Looking to the Future

DeepSeek R1 isn't perfect, but it demonstrates the new possibilities of open-source LLMs. Especially considering its price competitiveness and performance, it's a really attractive option. Anyway, I’m really excited to see what kind of models the DeepSeek team will release in the future. The AI revolution in China has only just begun. Honestly, AI technology competition will likely become even more intense between the US and China.

Anyone who’s tried DeepSeek R1, please share your experiences!


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investment decisions should be made based on your own judgment and responsibility.